Robust Statistical Tests for Evaluating the Hypothesis of Close Fit of Misspecified Mean and Covariance Structural Models
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Model close fit is one key issue in the mean and covariance structure analysis. In this article, we utilize the latest results on the general distribution of likelihood ratio statistic in this methodology and propose several distribution free root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) tests for evaluating the hypothesis of close fit of misspecified models. Simulation studies show that three of these tests have robust and desirable performance in spite of severe nonnormality across the examples when sample size is as large as 300. A new two-stage procedure which combines model exact fit tests and the proposed RMSEA tests for model close fit is further proposed for overall model fit evaluation.
منابع مشابه
Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification
This study evaluated the sensitivity of maximum likelihood (ML)-, generalized least squares (GLS)-, and asymptotic distribution-free (ADF)-based fit indices to model misspecification, under conditions that varied sample size and distribution. The effect of violating assumptions of asymptotic robustness theory also was examined. Standardized root-mean-square residual (SRMR) was the most sensitiv...
متن کاملON CHI-SQUARE DIFFERENCE AND z TESTS IN MEAN AND COVARIANCE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS WHEN THE BASE MODEL IS MISSPECIFIED
In mean and covariance structure analysis, the chi-square difference test is often applied to evaluate the number of factors, cross-group constraints, and other nested model comparisons. Let model Ma be the base model within which model Mb is nested. In practice, this test is commonly used to justify Mb even when Ma is misspecified. The authors study the behavior of the chi-square difference te...
متن کاملShame for disrespecting evidence: the personal consequences of insufficient respect for structural equation model testing
BACKGROUND Inappropriate and unacceptable disregard for structural equation model (SEM) testing can be traced back to: factor-analytic inattention to model testing, misapplication of the Wilkinson task force's [Am Psychol 54:594-604, 1999] critique of tests, exaggeration of test biases, and uncomfortably-numerous model failures. DISCUSSION The arguments for disregarding structural equation mo...
متن کاملEvaluating model fit for growth curve models: Integration of fit indices from SEM and MLM frameworks.
Evaluating overall model fit for growth curve models involves 3 challenging issues. (a) Three types of longitudinal data with different implications for model fit may be distinguished: balanced on time with complete data, balanced on time with data missing at random, and unbalanced on time. (b) Traditional work on fit from the structural equation modeling (SEM) perspective has focused only on t...
متن کاملStructural Equation Modeling (SEM) in Health Sciences Education Researches: An Overview of the Method and Its Application
Introduction: There are many situations through which researchers of human sciences particularly in health sciences education attempt to assess relationships of variables. Moreover researchers may be willing to assess overall fit of theoretical models with the data emerged from the study population. This review introduces the structural equation models method and its application in health scien...
متن کامل